In Defense of the 4-Way Test
In defense of The Four-Way Test
Rotarian Magazine - April 2010Editor's note: More than 20 people wrote responses to a letter about The Four-Way Test that ran in the December issue. Here are a few of them. Read more responses online.
Jim
Patton
Avondale, Pa., USA
As a brand new member of Rotary, I joined the organization partly because of
its commitment to high ideals. Imagine my disappointment when I read the
critique of our Four-Way Test. Yes, we do live in an imperfect, sometimes
unfair, world. Does that give us an excuse to cop out on ethics? Should we have
nothing better to aspire to, no guiding principles by which to live? Not me. I
will continue to recite The Four-Way Test at every meeting. In addition, I will
try to apply the principles in my life and teach them to others, especially to
young people. It may not be much, but every pebble in the water creates a ripple
somewhere.
Paula Becker
Florence, Ore., USA
A writer in December feels that Rotary should not promote The Four-Way Test
and explains his view of why it is wrong. His arguments are posed as if the test
consisted of commands – as if it read, for example, "It must build goodwill and
better friendships." But the brilliance of The Four-Way Test is in its questions
about the things we think, say, and do. It does not give orders or answers.
Answers tend to end an inquiry, while questions open the mind and illuminate
the issues. To ask, "Is it the truth?" is to look at how we apply our principles
of honesty and integrity to the matter at hand. The concept "beneficial to all
concerned" is, to our test critic, "not the way the world works." Could be, but
is that the point? The question invites us to assess whether a thought, action,
or word might be to the needless detriment of others – or whether, instead, we
might look at how to create potential benefit to those concerned.
In 22
years of Rotary committees and team meetings, I can't count how often a
difficult choice suddenly becomes clear when someone muses, "Let's see … Does it
build goodwill and better friendships?" Here we're called on to value
relationships and to pay attention not only to the choices we make but how we
get there and communicate with those involved.
When we ask, "Is it fair to
all concerned?" we're likely to exercise our instincts toward justice – to
consider the long-term effects on those around us. Is it fair for me to pass
along a bit of information about someone, for example, or would it be more fair
to stop and ask, "Am I sure I know the whole truth? Will it create goodwill?
Does anyone benefit?"
The questions of The Four-Way Test engage the
individual's will to make reasoned and caring choices. In using the test, we
take our stand for greater integrity, more excellent service, and richer
friendships.
Maureen McDaniel Merrill
Windsor, Calif., USA